f35df0475b
Signed-off-by: Andrea Luzzardi <aluzzardi@gmail.com>
164 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
164 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
# Dagger: the devops superglu, by the creators of docker
|
|
|
|
Dagger is a scripting environment for automating the delivery of your application to the cloud,
|
|
from code to production.
|
|
|
|
If you are familiar with PaaS services like Heroku, Firebase or Openshift:
|
|
Dagger makes it easy to create a custom PaaS that is perfectly tailored to each application,
|
|
instead of forcing it into a rigid, homogeneous mold. The Dagger philosophy
|
|
is that the platform should adapt to the application, not the other way around.
|
|
|
|
This means that, unlike traditional PaaS, you can use Dagger with all your applications,
|
|
*without having to change your tooling, software stack or infrastructure*.
|
|
|
|
TODO:
|
|
*[... principles: productivity + compat]*
|
|
*[.. do out-of-the-box things that would require months of work otherwise]*
|
|
*[.. alternative to the dilemna: paas or build your own?]*
|
|
|
|
## Warning: alpha software
|
|
|
|
Please note that Dagger is *alpha-quality software*. This means it has many bugs,
|
|
the user interface is minimal, and it may change in incompatible ways at any time.
|
|
|
|
If you are still willing to try it, thank you! We appreciate your help.
|
|
Please do not hesitate to ask questions, report bugs, or share feedback,
|
|
either in a github or in the discord chatroom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Platform as code
|
|
|
|
The most important feature of Dagger is that it is *programmable*.
|
|
|
|
Thanks to its powerful scripting environment and growing catalog of reusable components,
|
|
anyone with basic programming knowledge can assemble a custom platform for their application,
|
|
and quickly start automating repetitive and complex tasks, so the entire team can spend
|
|
less time getting deployment to work, and more time developing.
|
|
|
|
Whether you're a seasoned SRE building a custom PAAS for your organization, a hobbyist on a fun
|
|
over-engineered week-end project, or a developer trying to setup CICD because, well, someone has to do it..
|
|
There's a whole community of fellow automation enthusiasts ready to help you write your first script.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Usage examples
|
|
|
|
A few examples of how Dagger is used in the wild:
|
|
|
|
- Use AWS Elastic Container Service to deploy the new API, while continuing to deploy the main app on Heroku.
|
|
- Deploy lightweight staging environments on-demand for QA, integration testing or product demos.
|
|
- Run integration tests on a live production-like deployment, automatically, for each pull request.
|
|
- Deploy the same app on Netlify for testing, and on Kubernetes for production
|
|
- Replace a 500-line deploy.sh with a 10-line configuration file
|
|
- Control sprawl of serverless functions on AWS, Google Cloud, Cloudflare, Netlify etc. by gradually
|
|
moving them to a generic interface, and switching backend at will.
|
|
- When the ML team uploads a new model to their S3 bucket, automatically incorporate it into staging
|
|
deployments, but not into production until manual confirmation!
|
|
- Rotate database credentials, and automatically re-deploy all staging environments with the new credentials.
|
|
- Allocate cool auto-generated URLs to development instances, and automatically configure your DNS,
|
|
load-balancer and SSL certificate manager to route traffic to them.
|
|
- Orchestrate application deployment across 2 infrastructure siloes, one managed with CloudFormation, the other with Terraform.
|
|
- Migrate from Helm to Kustomize, without disrupting next week's big release.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Getting started
|
|
|
|
1. Build the `dagger` command-line tool. You will need [Go](https://golang.org) version 1.16 or later.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
$ make
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
2. Copy the `dagger` tool to a location listed in your `$PATH`. For example, to copy it to `/usr/local/bin`:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
$ cp ./cmd/dagger/dagger /usr/local/bin
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
3. Compute a test configuration
|
|
|
|
Currently `dagger` can only do one thing: compute a configuration with optional inputs, and print the result.
|
|
|
|
If you are confused by how to use this for your application, that is normal: `dagger compute` is a low-level command
|
|
which exposes the naked plumbing of the Dagger engine. In future versions, more user-friendly commands will be available
|
|
which hide the complexity of `dagger compute` (but it will always be available to power users, of course!).
|
|
|
|
Here is an example command, using an example configuration:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
$ dagger compute ./examples/simple --input-string www.host=mysuperapp.com --input-dir www.source=.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Custom buildkit setup
|
|
|
|
Dagger can be configured to use an existing buildkit daemon, running either locally or remotely. This can be done using two environment variables: `BUILDKIT_HOST` and `DOCKER_HOST`.
|
|
|
|
To use a buildkit daemon listening on TCP port `1234` on localhost:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
$ export BUILDKIT_HOST=tcp://localhost:1234
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
To use a buildkit daemon running in a container named "super-buildkit" on the local docker host:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
$ export BUILDKIT_HOST=docker-container://super-buildkit
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
To use a buildkit daemon running on a remote docker host (be careful to properly secure remotely accessible docker hosts!)
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
$ export BUILDKIT_HOST=docker-container://super-buildkit
|
|
$ export DOCKER_HOST=tcp://my-remote-docker-host:2376
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## OpenTracing Support
|
|
|
|
Both Dagger and buildkit support opentracing. To capture traces to
|
|
[Jaeger](https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger), ), set the `JAEGER_TRACE` environment variable to the collection address.
|
|
|
|
A `docker-compose` file is available to help bootstrap the tracing environment:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
docker-compose -f ./tracing.compose.yaml up -d
|
|
export JAEGER_TRACE=localhost:6831
|
|
export BUILDKIT_HOST=docker-container://dagger-buildkitd-jaeger
|
|
|
|
dagger compute ...
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
You can then go to [http://localhost:16686/](http://localhost:16686/) in your browser to see the traces.
|
|
|
|
## Comparison to other automation platforms
|
|
|
|
|
|
### CICD
|
|
|
|
Github, Gitlab, Jenkins, Spinnaker, Tekton
|
|
|
|
### Build systems
|
|
|
|
Bazel, Nix, Skopeo
|
|
|
|
### Infrastructure automation
|
|
|
|
Terraform, Pulumi, Ansible
|
|
|
|
### Traditional scripting
|
|
|
|
Bash, Make, Python
|
|
|
|
### PaaS
|
|
|
|
Heroku, Elastic Beanstalk, Cloud Foundry, Openshift
|
|
|
|
### Kubernetes management
|
|
|
|
Kustomize, Helm, jsonnet
|
|
|
|
### Gitops
|
|
|
|
Flux, ...
|
|
|
|
|