fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.22.3 #3
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "renovate/react-router-monorepo"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
This PR contains the following updates:
6.0.0-beta.0
->6.22.3
6.0.0-beta.0
->6.22.3
Release Notes
remix-run/react-router (react-router)
v6.22.3
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.15.3
v6.22.2
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.15.2
v6.22.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.15.1
v6.22.0
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.15.0
v6.21.3
Compare Source
Patch Changes
unstable_
prefix fromBlocker
/BlockerFunction
types (#11187)v6.21.2
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.14.2
v6.21.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
route.lazy
not working correctly on initial SPA load whenv7_partialHydration
is specified (#11121)@remix-run/router@1.14.1
v6.21.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
Add a new
future.v7_relativeSplatPath
flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#11087)This fix was originally added in #10983 and was later reverted in #11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #11052)
The Bug
The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (
*
) portion of the current route path.The Background
This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in
<Routes>
easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:Any paths like
/dashboard
,/dashboard/team
,/dashboard/projects
will match theDashboard
route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested<Routes>
:Now, all links and route paths are relative to the router above them. This makes code splitting and compartmentalizing your app really easy. You could render the
Dashboard
as its own independent app, or embed it into your large app without making any changes to it.The Problem
The problem is that this concept of ignoring part of a path breaks a lot of other assumptions in React Router - namely that
"."
always means the current location pathname for that route. When we ignore the splat portion, we start getting invalid paths when using"."
:We've also introduced an issue that we can no longer move our
DashboardTeam
component around our route hierarchy easily - since it behaves differently if we're underneath a non-splat route, such as/dashboard/:widget
. Now, our"."
links will, properly point to ourself inclusive of the dynamic param value so behavior will break from it's corresponding usage in a/dashboard/*
route.Even worse, consider a nested splat route configuration:
Now, a
<Link to=".">
and a<Link to="..">
inside theDashboard
component go to the same place! That is definitely not correct!Another common issue arose in Data Routers (and Remix) where any
<Form>
should post to it's own routeaction
if you the user doesn't specify a form action:This is just a compounded issue from the above because the default location for a
Form
to submit to is itself ("."
) - and if we ignore the splat portion, that now resolves to the parent route.The Solution
If you are leveraging this behavior, it's recommended to enable the future flag, move your splat to it's own route, and leverage
../
for any links to "sibling" pages:This way,
.
means "the full current pathname for my route" in all cases (including static, dynamic, and splat routes) and..
always means "my parents pathname".Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.14.0
v6.20.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
useResolvedPath
fix for splat routes due to a large number of applications that were relying on the buggy behavior (see #11052 (comment)). We plan to re-introduce this fix behind a future flag in the next minor version. (#11078)@remix-run/router@1.13.1
v6.20.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
PathParam
type from the public API (#10719)Patch Changes
resolveTo
in splat routes (#11045)getPathContributingMatches
UNSAFE_getPathContributingMatches
export from@remix-run/router
since we no longer need this in thereact-router
/react-router-dom
layers@remix-run/router@1.13.0
v6.19.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
unstable_flushSync
option touseNavigate
/useSumbit
/fetcher.load
/fetcher.submit
to opt-out ofReact.startTransition
and intoReactDOM.flushSync
for state updates (#11005)unstable_
prefix from theuseBlocker
hook as it's been in use for enough time that we are confident in the API. We do not plan to remove the prefix fromunstable_usePrompt
due to differences in how browsers handlewindow.confirm
that prevent React Router from guaranteeing consistent/correct behavior. (#10991)Patch Changes
Fix
useActionData
so it returns proper contextual action data and not any action data in the tree (#11023)Fix bug in
useResolvedPath
that would causeuseResolvedPath(".")
in a splat route to lose the splat portion of the URL path. (#10983)"."
paths inside a splat route which incorrectly dropped the splat portion of the URL. If you are relative routing via"."
inside a splat route in your application you should double check that your logic is not relying on this buggy behavior and update accordingly.Updated dependencies:
@remix-run/router@1.12.0
v6.18.0
Compare Source
Patch Changes
future
prop onBrowserRouter
,HashRouter
andMemoryRouter
so that it accepts aPartial<FutureConfig>
instead of requiring all flags to be included. (#10962)@remix-run/router@1.11.0
v6.17.0
Compare Source
Patch Changes
RouterProvider
future
prop type to be aPartial<FutureConfig>
so that not all flags must be specified (#10900)@remix-run/router@1.10.0
v6.16.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
any
withunknown
on exposed typings for user-provided data. To do this in Remix v2 without introducing breaking changes in React Router v6, we have added generics to a number of shared types. These continue to default toany
in React Router and are overridden withunknown
in Remix. In React Router v7 we plan to move these tounknown
as a breaking change. (#10843)Location
now accepts a generic for thelocation.state
valueActionFunctionArgs
/ActionFunction
/LoaderFunctionArgs
/LoaderFunction
now accept a generic for thecontext
parameter (only used in SSR usages viacreateStaticHandler
)useMatches
(now exported asUIMatch
) accepts generics formatch.data
andmatch.handle
- both of which were already set tounknown
@private
class exportErrorResponse
to anUNSAFE_ErrorResponseImpl
export since it is an implementation detail and there should be no construction ofErrorResponse
instances in userland. This frees us up to export atype ErrorResponse
which correlates to an instance of the class viaInstanceType
. Userland code should only ever be usingErrorResponse
as a type and should be type-narrowing viaisRouteErrorResponse
. (#10811)ShouldRevalidateFunctionArgs
interface (#10797)_isFetchActionRedirect
,_hasFetcherDoneAnything
) (#10715)Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.9.0
v6.15.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
redirectDocument()
function which allows users to specify that a redirect from aloader
/action
should trigger a document reload (viawindow.location
) instead of attempting to navigate to the redirected location via React Router (#10705)Patch Changes
useRevalidator
is referentially stable across re-renders if revalidations are not actively occurring (#10707)@remix-run/router@1.8.0
v6.14.2
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.7.2
v6.14.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
unstable_useBlocker
when used with an unstable blocker function (#10652)@remix-run/router@1.7.1
v6.14.0
Compare Source
Patch Changes
basename
from locations provided tounstable_useBlocker
functions to matchuseLocation
(#10573)generatePath
when passed a numeric0
value parameter (#10612)unstable_useBlocker
key issues inStrictMode
(#10573)tsc --skipLibCheck:false
issues on React 17 (#10622)typescript
to 5.1 (#10581)@remix-run/router@1.7.0
v6.13.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
Move
React.startTransition
usage behind a future flag to avoid issues with existing incompatibleSuspense
usages. We recommend folks adopting this flag to be better compatible with React concurrent mode, but if you run into issues you can continue without the use ofstartTransition
until v7. Issues usually boils down to creating net-new promises during the render cycle, so if you run into issues you should either lift your promise creation out of the render cycle or put it behind auseMemo
. (#10596)Existing behavior will no longer include
React.startTransition
:If you wish to enable
React.startTransition
, pass the future flag to your component:Patch Changes
React.startTransition
minification bug in production mode (#10588)v6.12.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
React.startTransition
to fix webpack + react 17 compilation error (#10569)v6.12.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
React.startTransition
if it exists (#10438)Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.6.3
v6.11.2
Compare Source
Patch Changes
basename
duplication in descendant<Routes>
inside a<RouterProvider>
(#10492)@remix-run/router@1.6.2
v6.11.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
Component
API within descendant<Routes>
(#10434)useNavigate
from<Routes>
inside a<RouterProvider>
(#10432)<Navigate>
in strict mode when using a data router (#10435)@remix-run/router@1.6.1
v6.11.0
Compare Source
Patch Changes
<Routes>
whenRouterProvider
errors existed (#10374)Component
instead ofelement
on a route definition (#10287)useNavigate
in the render cycle by setting theactiveRef
in a layout effect, allowing thenavigate
function to be passed to child components and called in auseEffect
there. (#10394)useSyncExternalStore
touseState
for internal@remix-run/router
router state syncing in<RouterProvider>
. We found some subtle bugs where router state updates got propagated before other normaluseState
updates, which could lead to footguns inuseEffect
calls. (#10377, #10409)useRevalidator()
to resolve a loader-driven error boundary scenario (#10369)RouterProvider
,useNavigate
/useSubmit
/fetcher.submit
are now stable across location changes, since we can handle relative routing via the@remix-run/router
instance and get rid of our dependence onuseLocation()
. When usingBrowserRouter
, these hooks remain unstable across location changes because they still rely onuseLocation()
. (#10336)@remix-run/router@1.6.0
v6.10.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
Added support for Future Flags in React Router. The first flag being introduced is
future.v7_normalizeFormMethod
which will normalize the exposeduseNavigation()/useFetcher()
formMethod
fields as uppercase HTTP methods to align with thefetch()
behavior. (#10207)future.v7_normalizeFormMethod === false
(default v6 behavior),useNavigation().formMethod
is lowercaseuseFetcher().formMethod
is lowercasefuture.v7_normalizeFormMethod === true
:useNavigation().formMethod
is uppercaseuseFetcher().formMethod
is uppercasePatch Changes
createRoutesFromElements
(#10193)@remix-run/router@1.5.0
v6.9.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
React Router now supports an alternative way to define your route
element
anderrorElement
fields as React Components instead of React Elements. You can instead pass a React Component to the newComponent
andErrorBoundary
fields if you choose. There is no functional difference between the two, so use whichever approach you prefer 😀. You shouldn't be defining both, but if you doComponent
/ErrorBoundary
will "win". (#10045)Example JSON Syntax
Example JSX Syntax
Introducing Lazy Route Modules! (#10045)
In order to keep your application bundles small and support code-splitting of your routes, we've introduced a new
lazy()
route property. This is an async function that resolves the non-route-matching portions of your route definition (loader
,action
,element
/Component
,errorElement
/ErrorBoundary
,shouldRevalidate
,handle
).Lazy routes are resolved on initial load and during the
loading
orsubmitting
phase of a navigation or fetcher call. You cannot lazily define route-matching properties (path
,index
,children
) since we only execute your lazy route functions after we've matched known routes.Your
lazy
functions will typically return the result of a dynamic import.Then in your lazy route modules, export the properties you want defined for the route:
An example of this in action can be found in the
examples/lazy-loading-router-provider
directory of the repository.🙌 Huge thanks to @rossipedia for the Initial Proposal and POC Implementation.
Updated dependencies:
@remix-run/router@1.4.0
Patch Changes
generatePath
incorrectly applying parameters in some cases (#10078)v6.8.2
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.3.3
v6.8.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.3.2
v6.8.0
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.3.1
v6.7.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
unstable_useBlocker
hook for blocking navigations within the app's location origin (#9709)Patch Changes
generatePath
when optional params are present (#9764)<Await>
to acceptReactNode
as children function return result (#9896)@remix-run/router@1.3.0
v6.6.2
Compare Source
Patch Changes
useId
consistency during SSR (#9805)v6.6.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.2.1
v6.6.0
Compare Source
Patch Changes
useLoaderData
usage inerrorElement
(#9735)@remix-run/router@1.2.0
v6.5.0
Compare Source
This release introduces support for Optional Route Segments. Now, adding a
?
to the end of any path segment will make that entire segment optional. This works for both static segments and dynamic parameters.Optional Params Examples
<Route path=":lang?/about>
will match:/:lang/about
/about
<Route path="/multistep/:widget1?/widget2?/widget3?">
will match:/multistep
/multistep/:widget1
/multistep/:widget1/:widget2
/multistep/:widget1/:widget2/:widget3
Optional Static Segment Example
<Route path="/home?">
will match:/
/home
<Route path="/fr?/about">
will match:/about
/fr/about
Minor Changes
Patch Changes
<Route path="prefix-:param">
, to align with how splat parameters work. If you were previously relying on this behavior then it's recommended to extract the static portion of the path at theuseParams
call site: (#9506)@remix-run/router@1.1.0
v6.4.5
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.0.5
v6.4.4
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.0.4
v6.4.3
Compare Source
Patch Changes
useRoutes
should be able to returnnull
when passinglocationArg
(#9485)initialEntries
type increateMemoryRouter
(#9498)@remix-run/router@1.0.3
v6.4.2
Compare Source
Patch Changes
IndexRouteObject
andNonIndexRouteObject
types to makehasErrorElement
optional (#9394)RouteObject
/RouteProps
types to surface the error in TypeScript. (#9366)@remix-run/router@1.0.2
v6.4.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
initialEntries
(#9288)@remix-run/router@1.0.1
v6.4.0
Compare Source
Whoa this is a big one!
6.4.0
brings all the data loading and mutation APIs over from Remix. Here's a quick high level overview, but it's recommended you go check out the docs, especially the feature overview and the tutorial.New APIs
createMemoryRouter
<RouterProvider>
loader
and mutate with a Routeaction
errorElement
defer
andAwait
Bug Fixes
useLocation
returns the scoped location inside a<Routes location>
component (#9094)Updated Dependencies
@remix-run/router@1.0.0
v6.3.0
: react-router@v6.3.0Compare Source
What's Changed
New Contributors
Full Changelog: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/compare/v6.2.2...v6.3.0
v6.2.2
Compare Source
What's Changed
🐛 Bug Fixes
New Contributors
Full Changelog: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/compare/v6.2.1...v6.2.2
v6.2.1
Compare Source
This release updates the internal
history
dependency to5.2.0
.Full Changelog: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/compare/v6.2.0...v6.2.1
v6.2.0
Compare Source
🐛 Bug fixes
RouteProps
element
type, which should be aReactNode
(#8473)useOutlet
for top-level routes (#8483)✨ Features
New Contributors
Full Changelog: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/compare/v6.1.1...v6.2.0
v6.1.1
Compare Source
In v6.1.0 we inadvertently shipped a new, undocumented API that will likely introduce bugs (#7586). We have flagged
HistoryRouter
asunstable_HistoryRouter
, as this API will likely need to change before a new major release.Full Changelog: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/compare/v6.1.0...v6.1.1
v6.1.0
Compare Source
🐛 Bug fixes
✨ Features
<Outlet>
can now receive acontext
prop. This value is passed to child routes and is accessible via the newuseOutletContext
hook. See the API docs for details. (#8461)<NavLink>
can now receive a child function for access to its props. (#8164)💅 Enhancements
useMatch
andmatchPath
. For example, when you calluseMatch("foo/:bar/:baz")
, the path is parsed and the return type will bePathMatch<"bar" | "baz">
. (#8030)New Contributors
Full Changelog: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/compare/v6.0.1...v6.1.0
v6.0.2
Compare Source
✨ Features
reloadDocument
prop to<Link>
. This allows<Link>
to function like a normal anchor tag by reloading the document after navigation while maintaining the relativeto
resolution.🗒️ Docs
🤝 New Contributors
Full Changelog
v6.0.1
Compare Source
🐛 Bug Fixes
<StaticRouter location>
value (#8243)<Route>
inside<Routes>
to help people make the change (#8238)v6.0.0
Compare Source
React Router v6 is here!
Please go read our blog post for more information on all the great stuff in v6 including notes about how to upgrade from React Router v5 and Reach Router.
v6.0.0-beta.8
Compare Source
Remember last week when we said
Yeah, about that … 😅
We found and squashed a few high-priority bugs that needed to be addressed first. But it's coming very soon, we promise! In the mean time, here's what you'll get from our eight-est and greatest beta release:
🐛 Bug Fixes
useHref
that resulted in the incorrect resolved value in cases where abasename
is used on the<Router />
component (See #8133 and #8142 for details).*
path value) are now correctly ranked ahead of layout routes.🗒️ Docs
We've added lots of goodies to our
docs
andexamples
, and there's a lot more yet to come. Take a look and see if you find something that makes your work a little easier! We think the lazy loading and custom query parsing examples are particularly cool! 🤓v6.0.0-beta.7
Compare Source
In this release we made a small but significant change to how
<Link to="..">
works. This is going to help out a lot if you were trying to use links in a*
route.We have also backed out our blocking/prompt APIs for the stable v6 release. We will revisit this post 6.0 when we have a little more time to get it right.
✨ Features
The major change in this release could also be classified as a bugfix or a breaking change, depending on how you look at it. We essentialy altered the way
<Link to="..">
works. See #8086 for the motivation behind this change.You'll probably want to reread the section in the v5 => v6 migration guide about
<Link to>
values (it has been updated), but it basically boils down to this: any leading..
segment in a<Link to>
value traverses "up" one route and builds upon that route's path instead of just removing one URL segment. This feature really completes the story of relative routes and links.We could consider this a bugfix, since this is how it was always intended to work in the first place. Without it, you'd have a difficult time linking predictably in
*
routes because your<a href>
would be different depending on the number of segments in the current URL.The reason this could also be considered a breaking change is that
..
now works slightly differently in<Link to>
than it would in<a href>
. When you have<a href="..">
it operates on the URL pathname, removing one segment of the current URL. However, since many routes really only match a single segment of the URL, there is often no difference between<Link to="..">
and<a href="..">
.💔 Breaking Changes
useBlocker()
,usePrompt()
, and<Prompt>
for now. We will revisit these post 6.0 when we have more time to get it right. But we don't want it to block (see what I did there) the release of all the other awesome stuff we've got in v6.🛠 Roadmap
We anticipate this will be the last beta release before v6 stable next week. Please give it a shot and let us know how it goes!
👍 Upgrading
If you're thinking about upgrading to v6, I published a few notes this past week that may help you:
<Redirect>
elements from any<Switch>
es you may have in your v5 app and how you can get better SEO in the process if you're currently relying on client-side redirects.<Route>
elements, which won't work in v6.Both of those posts contain steps you can take today in your v5 app without upgrading to v6.
We are also developing a backwards compat lib that should help some of you upgrade from v5 to v6. We'll post more about this when it's ready.
💻 Installing
Development for v6 has switched from
dev
to themain
branch.If you'd like to test it out, install from npm:
v6.0.0-beta.6
Compare Source
No big enhancements in this release, just squashing bugs and writing lots of tests! Also, we are hard at work on cranking out examples for v6. See the end of this post for an update on our roadmap between here and v6 stable.
🧰 Examples
We have begun creating some examples for v6 that we hope will help developers make effective use of all the new features we have. So far, we have examples for the following:
<Outlet>
APIuseNavigate()
hook, the<Navigate>
element, andlocation.state
useSearchParams()
hook<StaticRouter>
on the server and uses a<BrowserRouter>
withReactDOM.hydrate()
on the clientEach example includes a button in the README that allows you to instantly launch a running instance on StackBlitz that you can play with. We hope you enjoy exploring!
🐛 Bugfixes
<NavLink>
match only whole URL segments instead of pieces. This means that<NavLink to="/home/users">
will still be active at/home/users
, but not at/home/users2
. See #7523path
) never match unless one of their children do. See #8085af7d038
<Routes>
. This reverses a decision that we made in beta.5 to remove them. See #8073💔 Breaking Changes
*
) match only after a/
in the URL. This means that<Route path="files*">
will always match as if it were<Route path="files/*">
. The router will issue a warning if your route path ends with*
but not/*
🛠 Roadmap
We are very close to a stable release! The last big code changes we need to make are:
<Link to="..">
operates on the URL pathname. However, this makes it difficult to link to the parent route when you're in a splat route. See #8086. This will be a breaking change.useBlocker()
and<Prompt>
in our initial v6 release, with plans to revisit them and possibly add them back at some point in the future. I still need to write up something here that explains our rationale. This will also be a breaking change.<Routes location>
prop will be in v6, but it isn't ideal for animation.💻 Installing
Development for v6 is chugging along on the
dev
branch.If you'd like to test it out, install from npm:
v6.0.0-beta.5
Compare Source
This week's release adds some much-needed polish to a few niche features of the router: splat routes (a route that uses a
*
path) and basenames. It also adds arenderMatches
API that completes the story for those of you who may have been usingreact-router-config
in v4 and v5.🐛 Bugfixes
*
in a child route path matches after a slash following its parent route path. This fixes some situations where the*
was overly greedy (see #7972)<Link to=".">
anduseResolvedPath(".")
values are fixed in splat routes. Previously these resolved relative to the parent route's path. They now resolve relative to the path of the route that rendered them.✨ Enhancements
This release makes it easier to work with apps that have multiple entry points. Using the
<Router basename>
prop allows React Router to be easily deployed on only a portion of a larger site by using a portion of the URL pathname (the "basename") to transparently prefix all route paths and link navigations.For example, you can deploy one React Router app at the
/inbox
URL prefix, and another one at the/admin
prefix. These base URLs represent two different entry points into your app, each with its own bundles. The rest of your site, including the root / URL could be rendered by something other than React Router, for example by your server framework of choice.In the bundle for each entry point, simply initialize React Router with the basename of that entry point.
Then define your routes and link paths without using the
/inbox
URL prefix in any of them. The entire app will run relative to that prefix.Another improvement in this release is the addition of the
renderMatches
API, which is the complement ofmatchRoutes
. These APIs are both very low-level and should not normally be needed. But they are sometimes nice to use if you are doing your own data loading using the array ofmatches
that you get back frommatchRoutes
.matchRoutes
andrenderMatches
are the equivalent of thereact-router-config
package we shipped in v4 and v5, just built directly into the router instead of in a separate package.💔 Breaking Changes
<Routes basename>
has moved to<Router basename>
. This prop is also available on all router variants (<BrowserRouter>
,<HashRouter>
, etc.).useLocation().pathname
no longer includes the basename, if present.basename
argument was removed fromuseRoutes
. This reverts the signature touseRoutes(routes, location)
, same as it was previous to beta.4.<Routes>
do not get the params from their parents. This helps a set of<Routes>
to be more portable by decoupling it from the params of its parents and makes it easier to know which params will be returned fromuseParams()
. If you were relying on this behavior previously, you'll need to pass along the params manually to the elements rendered by the descendant<Routes>
. See this comment for an example of how this is to be done and for a potential workaround if you really need the old behavior.match.pathname
in a splat route now includes the portion of the pathname matched by the*
. This makes the*
param behave much more like other dynamic:id
-style params.<Link>
s in splat routes is changed now because the entire pathname that was matched by that route is now different (see previous bullet). Instead of resolving relative to the portion of the pathname before the*
, paths resolve relative to the full pathname that was matched by the route.💻 Installing
Development for v6 is chugging along on the
dev
branch.If you'd like to test it out, install from npm:
v6.0.0-beta.4
Compare Source
Last week we released a lot of nice little bug features, but we did get a little carried away and let a little bug slip through with relative path resolution. Our bad! That nasty lil' guy is squashed in this week's beta. 🐛
And there's more! Let's dive in…
🐛 Bugfixes
✨ Enhancements
Params
type which is now generic, so you can add your own types if you know what to expect from functions that return query parameters. (#8019)There was quite a bit of discussion in #7335 from people who are using constants to define their route paths. In this style, paths are often written as absolute paths from the root
/
URL. These constants are then able to be used both in<Route path>
definitions as well as<Link to>
values. It usually looks something like this:This style of use is now fully supported in v6. This is great for people who write their apps like this, but it technically could cause some breakage if you were using absolute paths (that start with
/
) in nested routes in previous betas. To fix this, simply remove the/
from the beginning of any route paths that are meant to be relative. React Router will throw an error if you are using absolute paths that don't match their parent route paths. Hopefully this should help you find them if you are upgrading.If you were using
<Route path="/">
to indicate an index route, you can now use the new<Route index>
prop to accomplish the same thing. Theindex
prop makes it easy to scan a route config to find the index route. It also provides a guarantee that nobody will ever add children to that route.Here's the same route config as the one above, but rewritten with relative paths and the
index
prop:A lot of our work on React Router is about doing the least surprising thing for our users. Allowing absolute paths in nested routes gets us a little closer to that goal!
💔 Breaking Changes
Removed the ability for nested route paths to begin with a
/
and not contain the complete path of their parent routes. This was necessary in order to introduce support for absolute paths in nested routes, described in detail aboveRemoved the
createRoutesFromArray
utility function. You can now pass your routes directly touseRoutes
ormatchRoutes
without passing it throughcreateRoutesFromArray
firstRemoved the
PartialRouteObject
type. If you were importing and using this type before, useRouteObject
instead, which has been updated to make all properties optionalThe
useRoutes
API has changed slightly. Instead of passing a basename as the second argument, you should instead pass it as a named property in an object:matchPath
function now returnsmatch.pattern
instead ofmatch.path
, which is a little more descriptive about what it actually is💻 Installing
Development for v6 is chugging along on the
dev
branch.If you'd like to test it out, install from npm:
v6.0.0-beta.3
Compare Source
Loads of goodies for you this week, as well as a few breaking changes for all of you eager beavers who are brave enough to use beta software in production! 🦫
(seriously, thank you all for helping us tighten up our APIs and fix nasty bugs)
💔 Breaking Changes!
NavLink
no longer supports theactiveClassName
oractiveStyle
props. Instead, we provide a more powerful API that allows you to pass functions to either theclassName
orstyle
props to conditionally apply values based on the link'sactive
state. While a bit more verbose in some cases, this offers a nicer experience for folks who use utility class-based CSS. (#7194)useRoutes
API has changed slightly. Instead of passing a basename as the second argument, you should instead pass it as a named property in an object:🐛 Bugfixes
basename
prop onRoutes
is treated as case-insensitive (#7997)useNavigate
previously used the incorrectpathname
when called from parent routes when the URL matches one of its children. This fix also applies touseSearchParams
(#7880)✨ Enhancements
Routes
anduseRoutes
now allow you to override thelocation
, which may be useful when building some modal interfaces and route transition animations. We are working hard to update our docs to include examples for advanced patterns where this might be useful, but in the mean time this also bringsRoutes
closer to feature parity with v5'sSwitch
via thelocation
prop. (#7117)useClickHandler
andusePressHandler
to make customizingLinks
a bit easier. (#7998)Link
, be sure to render an actual HTML anchor element, otherwise your app will likely be inaccessible without a significant amount of additional work which, I assure you, you don't want to do!💻 Installing
Development for v6 is chugging along on the
dev
branch.If you'd like to test it out, install from npm:
🙏 Credits
Thanks to @andrelandgraf, @dhulme, @fgatti675, @hugmanrique, @MeiKatz, @chaance and @mjackson for your contributions!
v6.0.0-beta.2
Compare Source
🐛 Bugfixes
displayName
back to<Link />
and<NavLink />
components✨ Enhancements
navigate
function now prepends hash and search strings by default:useParams
now returns parameters from nested<Route />
s when called in a parent<Route />
💻 Installing
Development for v6 is chugging along on the
dev
branch.If you'd like to test it out, install from npm:
🙏 Credits
Thanks to @liho98, @wojtekmaj, @cravend, @chaance and @mjackson for your contributions!
Enjoy!
v6.0.0-beta.1
Compare Source
We're on the road to a stable v6 release!
There are no new features in this release since
beta.0
, but a handful of squashed bugs, perf enhancements, and DX improvements for TypeScript users.🐛 Bugfixes
+
characters no longer get decoded into spaces, and that little*
is just a little less greedy (e.g.,app/*
no longer matchesapples/*
).Link
andnavigate
should properly respect thebasename
when using absolute paths.✨ Enhancements
navigator
into a separate context object, meaning your components that calluseNavigate
will probably render a little less often. Wowza, much perf!react-router-dom
andreact-router-native
now re-exports all types exported fromreact-router
💻 Installing
Development for v6 is chugging along on the
dev
branch.If you'd like to test it out, install from npm:
🙏 Credits
Thanks to @brookslybrand, @bogdansoare, @chaance and @mjackson for your contributions!
Enjoy!
remix-run/react-router (react-router-dom)
v6.22.3
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.15.3
react-router@6.22.3
v6.22.2
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.15.2
react-router@6.22.2
v6.22.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
react-router@6.22.1
@remix-run/router@1.15.1
v6.22.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
window__reactRouterVersion
tag for CWV Report detection (#11222)Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.15.0
react-router@6.22.0
v6.21.3
Compare Source
Patch Changes
NavLink
isPending
when abasename
is used (#11195)unstable_
prefix fromBlocker
/BlockerFunction
types (#11187)react-router@6.21.3
v6.21.2
Compare Source
Patch Changes
useId
for internal fetcher keys when available (#11166)@remix-run/router@1.14.2
react-router@6.21.2
v6.21.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
react-router@6.21.1
@remix-run/router@1.14.1
v6.21.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
Add a new
future.v7_relativeSplatPath
flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#11087)This fix was originally added in #10983 and was later reverted in #11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #11052)
The Bug
The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (
*
) portion of the current route path.The Background
This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in
<Routes>
easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:Any paths like
/dashboard
,/dashboard/team
,/dashboard/projects
will match theDashboard
route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested<Routes>
:Now, all links and route paths are relative to the router above them. This makes code splitting and compartmentalizing your app really easy. You could render the
Dashboard
as its own independent app, or embed it into your large app without making any changes to it.The Problem
The problem is that this concept of ignoring part of a path breaks a lot of other assumptions in React Router - namely that
"."
always means the current location pathname for that route. When we ignore the splat portion, we start getting invalid paths when using"."
:We've also introduced an issue that we can no longer move our
DashboardTeam
component around our route hierarchy easily - since it behaves differently if we're underneath a non-splat route, such as/dashboard/:widget
. Now, our"."
links will, properly point to ourself inclusive of the dynamic param value so behavior will break from it's corresponding usage in a/dashboard/*
route.Even worse, consider a nested splat route configuration:
Now, a
<Link to=".">
and a<Link to="..">
inside theDashboard
component go to the same place! That is definitely not correct!Another common issue arose in Data Routers (and Remix) where any
<Form>
should post to it's own routeaction
if you the user doesn't specify a form action:This is just a compounded issue from the above because the default location for a
Form
to submit to is itself ("."
) - and if we ignore the splat portion, that now resolves to the parent route.The Solution
If you are leveraging this behavior, it's recommended to enable the future flag, move your splat to it's own route, and leverage
../
for any links to "sibling" pages:This way,
.
means "the full current pathname for my route" in all cases (including static, dynamic, and splat routes) and..
always means "my parents pathname".Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.14.0
react-router@6.21.0
v6.20.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
useResolvedPath
fix for splat routes due to a large number of applications that were relying on the buggy behavior (see #11052 (comment)). We plan to re-introduce this fix behind a future flag in the next minor version. (#11078)react-router@6.20.1
@remix-run/router@1.13.1
v6.20.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
PathParam
type from the public API (#10719)Patch Changes
react-router@6.20.0
@remix-run/router@1.13.0
v6.19.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
unstable_flushSync
option touseNavigate
/useSumbit
/fetcher.load
/fetcher.submit
to opt-out ofReact.startTransition
and intoReactDOM.flushSync
for state updates (#11005)unstable_usePrompt
to accept aBlockerFunction
in addition to aboolean
(#10991)Patch Changes
key
in auseFetcher
that remains mounted wasn't getting picked up (#11009)useFormAction
which was incorrectly inheriting the?index
query param from child routeaction
submissions (#11025)NavLink
active
logic whento
location has a trailing slash (#10734)react-router@6.19.0
@remix-run/router@1.12.0
v6.18.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
Add support for manual fetcher key specification via
useFetcher({ key: string })
so you can access the same fetcher instance from different components in your application without prop-drilling (RFC) (#10960)useFetchers
so that they can be looked up bykey
Add
navigate
/fetcherKey
params/props touseSumbit
/Form
to support kicking off a fetcher submission under the hood with an optionally user-specifiedkey
(#10960)useFetcher({ key })
to look it up elsewherePatch Changes
RouterProvider
that holds completed fetcher data, in preparation for the upcoming future flag that will change the fetcher persistence/cleanup behavior (#10961)future
prop onBrowserRouter
,HashRouter
andMemoryRouter
so that it accepts aPartial<FutureConfig>
instead of requiring all flags to be included. (#10962)@remix-run/router@1.11.0
react-router@6.18.0
v6.17.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
Add experimental support for the View Transitions API via
document.startViewTransition
to enable CSS animated transitions on SPA navigations in your application. (#10916)The simplest approach to enabling a View Transition in your React Router app is via the new
<Link unstable_viewTransition>
prop. This will cause the navigation DOM update to be wrapped indocument.startViewTransition
which will enable transitions for the DOM update. Without any additional CSS styles, you'll get a basic cross-fade animation for your page.If you need to apply more fine-grained styles for your animations, you can leverage the
unstable_useViewTransitionState
hook which will tell you when a transition is in progress and you can use that to apply classes or styles:You can also use the
<NavLink unstable_viewTransition>
shorthand which will manage the hook usage for you and automatically add atransitioning
class to the<a>
during the transition:For an example usage of View Transitions with React Router, check out our fork of the Astro Records demo.
For more information on using the View Transitions API, please refer to the Smooth and simple transitions with the View Transitions API guide from the Google Chrome team.
Please note, that because the
ViewTransition
API is a DOM API, we now export a specificRouterProvider
fromreact-router-dom
with this functionality. If you are importingRouterProvider
fromreact-router
, then it will not support view transitions. (#10928Patch Changes
ScrollRestoration
whensessionStorage
is unavailable (#10848)@remix-run/router@1.10.0
react-router@6.17.0
v6.16.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
@remix-run/router@1.9.0
react-router@6.16.0
Patch Changes
v6.15.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
redirectDocument()
function which allows users to specify that a redirect from aloader
/action
should trigger a document reload (viawindow.location
) instead of attempting to navigate to the redirected location via React Router (#10705)Patch Changes
URLSearchParams
and theuseSearchParams
hook. (#10620)useFormAction()
for unspecified actions since it cannot be determined on the server and causes hydration issues (#10758)unstable_usePrompt
to avoid throwing an exception if the prompt is unblocked and a navigation is performed synchronously (#10687, #10718)@remix-run/router@1.8.0
react-router@6.15.0
v6.14.2
Compare Source
Patch Changes
<ScrollRestoration>
(#10682)<Form state>
prop to populatehistory.state
on submission navigations (#10630)Error
subclasses such asReferenceError
/TypeError
(#10633)@remix-run/router@1.7.2
react-router@6.14.2
v6.14.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
react-router@6.14.1
@remix-run/router@1.7.1
v6.14.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
Add support for
application/json
andtext/plain
encodings foruseSubmit
/fetcher.submit
. To reflect these additional types,useNavigation
/useFetcher
now also containnavigation.json
/navigation.text
andfetcher.json
/fetcher.text
which include the json/text submission if applicable (#10413)Patch Changes
submitter
element, prefer the built-innew FormData(form, submitter)
instead of the previous manual approach in modern browsers (those that support the newsubmitter
parameter) (#9865, #10627)type="image"
buttonsformdata-submitter-polyfill
window.history.pushState/replaceState
before updating React Router state (instead of after) so thatwindow.location
matchesuseLocation
during synchronous React 17 rendering (#10448)window.location
and should always referenceuseLocation
when possible, aswindow.location
will not be in sync 100% of the time (due topopstate
events, concurrent mode, etc.)tsc --skipLibCheck:false
issues on React 17 (#10622)typescript
to 5.1 (#10581)react-router@6.14.0
@remix-run/router@1.7.0
v6.13.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
Move
React.startTransition
usage behind a future flag to avoid issues with existing incompatibleSuspense
usages. We recommend folks adopting this flag to be better compatible with React concurrent mode, but if you run into issues you can continue without the use ofstartTransition
until v7. Issues usually boils down to creating net-new promises during the render cycle, so if you run into issues you should either lift your promise creation out of the render cycle or put it behind auseMemo
. (#10596)Existing behavior will no longer include
React.startTransition
:If you wish to enable
React.startTransition
, pass the future flag to your component:Patch Changes
React.startTransition
minification bug in production mode (#10588)react-router@6.13.0
v6.12.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
React.startTransition
to fix webpack + react 17 compilation error (#10569)react-router@6.12.1
v6.12.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
React.startTransition
if it exists (#10438)Patch Changes
DOMException
(DataCloneError
) when attempting to perform aPUSH
navigation with non-serializable state. (#10427)@remix-run/router@1.6.3
react-router@6.12.0
v6.11.2
Compare Source
Patch Changes
SetURLSearchParams
type (#10444)react-router@6.11.2
@remix-run/router@1.6.2
v6.11.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
react-router@6.11.1
@remix-run/router@1.6.1
v6.11.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
basename
support inuseFetcher
(#10336)basename
then you will need to remove the manually prependedbasename
from yourfetcher
calls (fetcher.load('/basename/route') -> fetcher.load('/route')
)Patch Changes
Component
instead ofelement
on a route definition (#10287)<Link to="//">
and other invalid URL values (#10367)useSyncExternalStore
touseState
for internal@remix-run/router
router state syncing in<RouterProvider>
. We found some subtle bugs where router state updates got propagated before other normaluseState
updates, which could lead to footguns inuseEffect
calls. (#10377, #10409)StaticRouterProvider
's internalRouter
component (#10401)RouterProvider
,useNavigate
/useSubmit
/fetcher.submit
are now stable across location changes, since we can handle relative routing via the@remix-run/router
instance and get rid of our dependence onuseLocation()
. When usingBrowserRouter
, these hooks remain unstable across location changes because they still rely onuseLocation()
. (#10336)react-router@6.11.0
@remix-run/router@1.6.0
v6.10.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
Added support for Future Flags in React Router. The first flag being introduced is
future.v7_normalizeFormMethod
which will normalize the exposeduseNavigation()/useFetcher()
formMethod
fields as uppercase HTTP methods to align with thefetch()
behavior. (#10207)future.v7_normalizeFormMethod === false
(default v6 behavior),useNavigation().formMethod
is lowercaseuseFetcher().formMethod
is lowercasefuture.v7_normalizeFormMethod === true
:useNavigation().formMethod
is uppercaseuseFetcher().formMethod
is uppercasePatch Changes
createStaticHandler
to also check forErrorBoundary
on routes in addition toerrorElement
(#10190)@remix-run/router@1.5.0
react-router@6.10.0
v6.9.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
React Router now supports an alternative way to define your route
element
anderrorElement
fields as React Components instead of React Elements. You can instead pass a React Component to the newComponent
andErrorBoundary
fields if you choose. There is no functional difference between the two, so use whichever approach you prefer 😀. You shouldn't be defining both, but if you doComponent
/ErrorBoundary
will "win". (#10045)Example JSON Syntax
Example JSX Syntax
Introducing Lazy Route Modules! (#10045)
In order to keep your application bundles small and support code-splitting of your routes, we've introduced a new
lazy()
route property. This is an async function that resolves the non-route-matching portions of your route definition (loader
,action
,element
/Component
,errorElement
/ErrorBoundary
,shouldRevalidate
,handle
).Lazy routes are resolved on initial load and during the
loading
orsubmitting
phase of a navigation or fetcher call. You cannot lazily define route-matching properties (path
,index
,children
) since we only execute your lazy route functions after we've matched known routes.Your
lazy
functions will typically return the result of a dynamic import.Then in your lazy route modules, export the properties you want defined for the route:
An example of this in action can be found in the
examples/lazy-loading-router-provider
directory of the repository.🙌 Huge thanks to @rossipedia for the Initial Proposal and POC Implementation.
Updated dependencies:
react-router@6.9.0
@remix-run/router@1.4.0
v6.8.2
Compare Source
Patch Changes
<Link to>
as external if they are outside of the routerbasename
(#10135)useBlocker
to returnIDLE_BLOCKER
during SSR (#10046)<Link to>
urls (#10112)StaticRouterProvider
serialized hydration data (#10068)@remix-run/router@1.3.3
react-router@6.8.2
v6.8.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
Link
component (now also supportsmailto:
urls) (#9994)react-router@6.8.1
@remix-run/router@1.3.2
v6.8.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
Support absolute URLs in
<Link to>
. If the URL is for the current origin, it will still do a client-side navigation. If the URL is for a different origin then it will do a fresh document request for the new origin. (#9900)Patch Changes
useSearchParams
(#9969)preventScrollReset
on<fetcher.Form>
(#9963)pagehide
instead ofbeforeunload
for<ScrollRestoration>
. This has better cross-browser support, specifically on Mobile Safari. (#9945)@remix-run/router@1.3.1
react-router@6.8.0
v6.7.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
unstable_useBlocker
hook for blocking navigations within the app's location origin (#9709)unstable_usePrompt
hook for blocking navigations within the app's location origin (#9932)preventScrollReset
prop to<Form>
(#9886)Patch Changes
useBeforeUnload
(#9709)@remix-run/router@1.3.0
react-router@6.7.0
v6.6.2
Compare Source
Patch Changes
useId
consistency during SSR (#9805)react-router@6.6.2
v6.6.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.2.1
react-router@6.6.1
v6.6.0
Compare Source
Minor Changes
useBeforeUnload()
hook (#9664)unstable_
prefix fromcreateStaticHandler
/createStaticRouter
/StaticRouterProvider
(#9738)Patch Changes
Error
objects fromStaticRouterProvider
(#9664)<Form method>
anduseSubmit
method values (#9664)hydrationData
(#9664)<button formmethod>
form submission overriddes (#9664)@remix-run/router@1.2.0
react-router@6.6.0
v6.5.0
Compare Source
Patch Changes
react-router@6.5.0
@remix-run/router@1.1.0
v6.4.5
Compare Source
Patch Changes
@remix-run/router@1.0.5
react-router@6.4.5
v6.4.4
Compare Source
Patch Changes
NavLink
and descendant<Routes>
(#9589, #9647)ErrorResponse
instances when using built-in hydration (#9593)basename
in static data routers (#9591)@remix-run/router@1.0.4
react-router@6.4.4
v6.4.3
Compare Source
Patch Changes
createHashRouter
(#9409)index
routes with apath
inuseResolvedPath
(#9486)relative=path
prop onNavLink
(#9453)NavLink
behavior for root urls (#9497)@remix-run/router@1.0.3
react-router@6.4.3
v6.4.2
Compare Source
Patch Changes
basename
inuseFormAction
(#9352)RouteObject
/RouteProps
types to surface the error in TypeScript. (#9366)react-router@6.4.2
@remix-run/router@1.0.2
v6.4.1
Compare Source
Patch Changes
react-router@6.4.1
@remix-run/router@1.0.1
v6.4.0
Compare Source
Whoa this is a big one!
6.4.0
brings all the data loading and mutation APIs over from Remix. Here's a quick high level overview, but it's recommended you go check out the docs, especially the feature overview and the tutorial.New APIs
createMemoryRouter
/createBrowserRouter
/createHashRouter
<RouterProvider>
loader
and mutate with a Routeaction
errorElement
<Form>
componentuseFetcher()
defer
andAwait
<ScrollRestoration>
New Features
<Link relative="path">
(#9160)Bug Fixes
useLocation
returns the scoped location inside a<Routes location>
component (#9094)<Link replace>
prop if it is defined (#8779)Updated Dependencies
react-router@6.4.0
v6.3.0
: react-router@v6.3.0Compare Source
What's Changed
New Contributors
Full Changelog: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/compare/v6.2.2...v6.3.0
v6.2.2
Compare Source
What's Changed
🐛 Bug Fixes
New Contributors
Full Changelog: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/compare/v6.2.1...v6.2.2
v6.2.1
Compare Source
This release updates the internal
history
dependency to5.2.0
.Full Changelog: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/compare/v6.2.0...v6.2.1
v6.2.0
Compare Source
🐛 Bug fixes
RouteProps
element
type, which should be aReactNode
(#8473)useOutlet
for top-level routes (#8483)✨ Features
New Contributors
Full Changelog: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/compare/v6.1.1...v6.2.0
v6.1.1
Compare Source
In v6.1.0 we inadvertently shipped a new, undocumented API that will likely introduce bugs (#7586). We have flagged
HistoryRouter
asunstable_HistoryRouter
, as this API will likely need to change before a new major release.Full Changelog: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/compare/v6.1.0...v6.1.1
v6.1.0
Compare Source
🐛 Bug fixes
✨ Features
<Outlet>
can now receive acontext
prop. This value is passed to child routes and is accessible via the newuseOutletContext
hook. See the API docs for details. (#8461)<NavLink>
can now receive a child function for access to its props. (#8164)💅 Enhancements
useMatch
andmatchPath
. For example, when you calluseMatch("foo/:bar/:baz")
, the path is parsed and the return type will bePathMatch<"bar" | "baz">
. (#8030)New Contributors
Full Changelog: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/compare/v6.0.1...v6.1.0
v6.0.2
Compare Source
✨ Features
reloadDocument
prop to<Link>
. This allows<Link>
to function like a normal anchor tag by reloading the document after navigation while maintaining the relativeto
resolution.🗒️ Docs
🤝 New Contributors
Full Changelog
v6.0.1
Compare Source
🐛 Bug Fixes
<StaticRouter location>
value (#8243)<Route>
inside<Routes>
to help people make the change (#8238)v6.0.0
Compare Source
React Router v6 is here!
Please go read our blog post for more information on all the great stuff in v6 including notes about how to upgrade from React Router v5 and Reach Router.
v6.0.0-beta.8
Compare Source
Remember last week when we said
Yeah, about that … 😅
We found and squashed a few high-priority bugs that needed to be addressed first. But it's coming very soon, we promise! In the mean time, here's what you'll get from our eight-est and greatest beta release:
🐛 Bug Fixes
useHref
that resulted in the incorrect resolved value in cases where abasename
is used on the<Router />
component (See #8133 and #8142 for details).*
path value) are now correctly ranked ahead of layout routes.🗒️ Docs
We've added lots of goodies to our
docs
andexamples
, and there's a lot more yet to come. Take a look and see if you find something that makes your work a little easier! We think the lazy loading and custom query parsing examples are particularly cool! 🤓v6.0.0-beta.7
Compare Source
In this release we made a small but significant change to how
<Link to="..">
works. This is going to help out a lot if you were trying to use links in a*
route.We have also backed out our blocking/prompt APIs for the stable v6 release. We will revisit this post 6.0 when we have a little more time to get it right.
✨ Features
The major change in this release could also be classified as a bugfix or a breaking change, depending on how you look at it. We essentialy altered the way
<Link to="..">
works. See #8086 for the motivation behind this change.You'll probably want to reread the section in the v5 => v6 migration guide about
<Link to>
values (it has been updated), but it basically boils down to this: any leading..
segment in a<Link to>
value traverses "up" one route and builds upon that route's path instead of just removing one URL segment. This feature really completes the story of relative routes and links.We could consider this a bugfix, since this is how it was always intended to work in the first place. Without it, you'd have a difficult time linking predictably in
*
routes because your<a href>
would be different depending on the number of segments in the current URL.The reason this could also be considered a breaking change is that
..
now works slightly differently in<Link to>
than it would in<a href>
. When you have<a href="..">
it operates on the URL pathname, removing one segment of the current URL. However, since many routes really only match a single segment of the URL, there is often no difference between<Link to="..">
and<a href="..">
.💔 Breaking Changes
useBlocker()
,usePrompt()
, and<Prompt>
for now. We will revisit these post 6.0 when we have more time to get it right. But we don't want it to block (see what I did there) the release of all the other awesome stuff we've got in v6.🛠 Roadmap
We anticipate this will be the last beta release before v6 stable next week. Please give it a shot and let us know how it goes!
👍 Upgrading
If you're thinking about upgrading to v6, I published a few notes this past week that may help you:
<Redirect>
elements from any<Switch>
es you may have in your v5 app and how you can get better SEO in the process if you're currently relying on client-side redirects.<Route>
elements, which won't work in v6.Both of those posts contain steps you can take today in your v5 app without upgrading to v6.
We are also developing a backwards compat lib that should help some of you upgrade from v5 to v6. We'll post more about this when it's ready.
💻 Installing
Development for v6 has switched from
dev
to themain
branch.If you'd like to test it out, install from npm:
v6.0.0-beta.6
Compare Source
No big enhancements in this release, just squashing bugs and writing lots of tests! Also, we are hard at work on cranking out examples for v6. See the end of this post for an update on our roadmap between here and v6 stable.
🧰 Examples
We have begun creating some examples for v6 that we hope will help developers make effective use of all the new features we have. So far, we have examples for the following:
<Outlet>
APIuseNavigate()
hook, the<Navigate>
element, andlocation.state
useSearchParams()
hook<StaticRouter>
on the server and uses a<BrowserRouter>
withReactDOM.hydrate()
on the clientEach example includes a button in the README that allows you to instantly launch a running instance on StackBlitz that you can play with. We hope you enjoy exploring!
🐛 Bugfixes
<NavLink>
match only whole URL segments instead of pieces. This means that<NavLink to="/home/users">
will still be active at/home/users
, but not at/home/users2
. See #7523path
) never match unless one of their children do. See #8085af7d038
<Routes>
. This reverses a decision that we made in beta.5 to remove them. See #8073💔 Breaking Changes
*
) match only after a/
in the URL. This means that<Route path="files*">
will always match as if it were<Route path="files/*">
. The router will issue a warning if your route path ends with*
but not/*
🛠 Roadmap
We are very close to a stable release! The last big code changes we need to make are:
<Link to="..">
operates on the URL pathname. However, this makes it difficult to link to the parent route when you're in a splat route. See #8086. This will be a breaking change.useBlocker()
and<Prompt>
in our initial v6 release, with plans to revisit them and possibly add them back at some point in the future. I still need to write up something here that explains our rationale. This will also be a breaking change.<Routes location>
prop will be in v6, but it isn't ideal for animation.💻 Installing
Development for v6 is chugging along on the
dev
branch.If you'd like to test it out, install from npm:
v6.0.0-beta.5
Compare Source
This week's release adds some much-needed polish to a few niche features of the router: splat routes (a route that uses a
*
path) and basenames. It also adds arenderMatches
API that completes the story for those of you who may have been usingreact-router-config
in v4 and v5.🐛 Bugfixes
*
in a child route path matches after a slash following its parent route path. This fixes some situations where the*
was overly greedy (see #7972)<Link to=".">
anduseResolvedPath(".")
values are fixed in splat routes. Previously these resolved relative to the parent route's path. They now resolve relative to the path of the route that rendered them.✨ Enhancements
This release makes it easier to work with apps that have multiple entry points. Using the
<Router basename>
prop allows React Router to be easily deployed on only a portion of a larger site by using a portion of the URL pathname (the "basename") to transparently prefix all route paths and link navigations.For example, you can deploy one React Router app at the
/inbox
URL prefix, and another one at the/admin
prefix. These base URLs represent two different entry points into your app, each with its own bundles. The rest of your site, including the root / URL could be rendered by something other than React Router, for example by your server framework of choice.In the bundle for each entry point, simply initialize React Router with the basename of that entry point.
Then define your routes and link paths without using the
/inbox
URL prefix in any of them. The entire app will run relative to that prefix.Another improvement in this release is the addition of the
renderMatches
API, which is the complement ofmatchRoutes
. These APIs are both very low-level and should not normally be needed. But they are sometimes nice to use if you are doing your own data loading using the array ofmatches
that you get back frommatchRoutes
.matchRoutes
andrenderMatches
are the equivalent of thereact-router-config
package we shipped in v4 and v5, just built directly into the router instead of in a separate package.💔 Breaking Changes
<Routes basename>
has moved to<Router basename>
. This prop is also available on all router variants (<BrowserRouter>
,<HashRouter>
, etc.).useLocation().pathname
no longer includes the basename, if present.basename
argument was removed fromuseRoutes
. This reverts the signature touseRoutes(routes, location)
, same as it was previous to beta.4.<Routes>
do not get the params from their parents. This helps a set of<Routes>
to be more portable by decoupling it from the params of its parents and makes it easier to know which params will be returned fromuseParams()
. If you were relying on this behavior previously, you'll need to pass along the params manually to the elements rendered by the descendant<Routes>
. See this comment for an example of how this is to be done and for a potential workaround if you really need the old behavior.match.pathname
in a splat route now includes the portion of the pathname matched by the*
. This makes the*
param behave much more like other dynamic:id
-style params.<Link>
s in splat routes is changed now because the entire pathname that was matched by that route is now different (see previous bullet). Instead of resolving relative to the portion of the pathname before the*
, paths resolve relative to the full pathname that was matched by the route.💻 Installing
Development for v6 is chugging along on the
dev
branch.If you'd like to test it out, install from npm:
v6.0.0-beta.4
Compare Source
Last week we released a lot of nice little bug features, but we did get a little carried away and let a little bug slip through with relative path resolution. Our bad! That nasty lil' guy is squashed in this week's beta. 🐛
And there's more! Let's dive in…
🐛 Bugfixes
✨ Enhancements
Params
type which is now generic, so you can add your own types if you know what to expect from functions that return query parameters. (#8019)There was quite a bit of discussion in #7335 from people who are using constants to define their route paths. In this style, paths are often written as absolute paths from the root
/
URL. These constants are then able to be used both in<Route path>
definitions as well as<Link to>
values. It usually looks something like this:This style of use is now fully supported in v6. This is great for people who write their apps like this, but it technically could cause some breakage if you were using absolute paths (that start with
/
) in nested routes in previous betas. To fix this, simply remove the/
from the beginning of any route paths that are meant to be relative. React Router will throw an error if you are using absolute paths that don't match their parent route paths. Hopefully this should help you find them if you are upgrading.If you were using
<Route path="/">
to indicate an index route, you can now use the new<Route index>
prop to accomplish the same thing. Theindex
prop makes it easy to scan a route config to find the index route. It also provides a guarantee that nobody will ever add children to that route.Here's the same route config as the one above, but rewritten with relative paths and the
index
prop:A lot of our work on React Router is about doing the least surprising thing for our users. Allowing absolute paths in nested routes gets us a little closer to that goal!
💔 Breaking Changes
Removed the ability for nested route paths to begin with a
/
and not contain the complete path of their parent routes. This was necessary in order to introduce support for absolute paths in nested routes, described in detail aboveRemoved the
createRoutesFromArray
utility function. You can now pass your routes directly touseRoutes
ormatchRoutes
without passing it throughcreateRoutesFromArray
firstRemoved the
PartialRouteObject
type. If you were importing and using this type before, useRouteObject
instead, which has been updated to make all properties optionalThe
useRoutes
API has changed slightly. Instead of passing a basename as the second argument, you should instead pass it as a named property in an object:matchPath
function now returnsmatch.pattern
instead ofmatch.path
, which is a little more descriptive about what it actually is💻 Installing
Development for v6 is chugging along on the
dev
branch.If you'd like to test it out, install from npm:
v6.0.0-beta.3
Compare Source
Loads of goodies for you this week, as well as a few breaking changes for all of you eager beavers who are brave enough to use beta software in production! 🦫
(seriously, thank you all for helping us tighten up our APIs and fix nasty bugs)
💔 Breaking Changes!
NavLink
no longer supports theactiveClassName
oractiveStyle
props. Instead, we provide a more powerful API that allows you to pass functions to either theclassName
orstyle
props to conditionally apply values based on the link'sactive
state. While a bit more verbose in some cases, this offers a nicer experience for folks who use utility class-based CSS. (#7194)useRoutes
API has changed slightly. Instead of passing a basename as the second argument, you should instead pass it as a named property in an object:🐛 Bugfixes
basename
prop onRoutes
is treated as case-insensitive (#7997)useNavigate
previously used the incorrectpathname
when called from parent routes when the URL matches one of its children. This fix also applies touseSearchParams
(#7880)✨ Enhancements
Routes
anduseRoutes
now allow you to override thelocation
, which may be useful when building some modal interfaces and route transition animations. We are working hard to update our docs to include examples for advanced patterns where this might be useful, but in the mean time this also bringsRoutes
closer to feature parity with v5'sSwitch
via thelocation
prop. (#7117)useClickHandler
andusePressHandler
to make customizingLinks
a bit easier. (#7998)Link
, be sure to render an actual HTML anchor element, otherwise your app will likely be inaccessible without a significant amount of additional work which, I assure you, you don't want to do!💻 Installing
Development for v6 is chugging along on the
dev
branch.If you'd like to test it out, install from npm:
🙏 Credits
Thanks to @andrelandgraf, @dhulme, @fgatti675, @hugmanrique, @MeiKatz, @chaance and @mjackson for your contributions!
v6.0.0-beta.2
Compare Source
🐛 Bugfixes
displayName
back to<Link />
and<NavLink />
components✨ Enhancements
navigate
function now prepends hash and search strings by default:useParams
now returns parameters from nested<Route />
s when called in a parent<Route />
💻 Installing
Development for v6 is chugging along on the
dev
branch.If you'd like to test it out, install from npm:
🙏 Credits
Thanks to @liho98, @wojtekmaj, @cravend, @chaance and @mjackson for your contributions!
Enjoy!
v6.0.0-beta.1
Compare Source
We're on the road to a stable v6 release!
There are no new features in this release since
beta.0
, but a handful of squashed bugs, perf enhancements, and DX improvements for TypeScript users.🐛 Bugfixes
+
characters no longer get decoded into spaces, and that little*
is just a little less greedy (e.g.,app/*
no longer matchesapples/*
).Link
andnavigate
should properly respect thebasename
when using absolute paths.✨ Enhancements
navigator
into a separate context object, meaning your components that calluseNavigate
will probably render a little less often. Wowza, much perf!react-router-dom
andreact-router-native
now re-exports all types exported fromreact-router
💻 Installing
Development for v6 is chugging along on the
dev
branch.If you'd like to test it out, install from npm:
🙏 Credits
Thanks to @brookslybrand, @bogdansoare, @chaance and @mjackson for your contributions!
Enjoy!
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Enabled.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.
This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.
Update react-router monorepo to v6.22.3to fix(deps): update react-router monorepo to v6.22.3dbd1e61d6f
tod2ebbd8ee6
d2ebbd8ee6
to3e99380a07