Docs: Dagger vs Build Systems
Signed-off-by: Solomon Hykes <sh.github.6811@hykes.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d8ae5d288e
commit
5925767841
@ -31,3 +31,11 @@ Dagger can either replace artisanal deploy scripts altogether, or augment them b
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Dagger is not a replacement for a CI system. It can be used to deploy applications directly from the terminal,
|
Dagger is not a replacement for a CI system. It can be used to deploy applications directly from the terminal,
|
||||||
or automatically as part of a CI script.
|
or automatically as part of a CI script.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Dagger vs. Build Systems (Make, Maven, Bazel, Npm/Yarn, etc.)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*Summary: Dagger can be used with or without a build system.*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Most deployment workflows involve building: the process of producing executable artifacts from source code. Build systems are highly specific to the type of application, the programming language in use, etc.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Dagger can integrate any build system into an overall deployment workflow. If a Dagger module is not already available for a particular build system, a custom module can easily be written, and perhaps even contributed to the open-source catalog for everyone else to use.
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user