diff --git a/docs/getting-started/1200-local-dev.md b/docs/getting-started/1200-local-dev.md index 695948cd..644a49a4 100644 --- a/docs/getting-started/1200-local-dev.md +++ b/docs/getting-started/1200-local-dev.md @@ -67,20 +67,20 @@ dagger do build With an empty cache, installing all dependencies, then testing & generating a build for this example app completes in just under 3 minutes: ```shell -[✔] client.filesystem.".".read 0.1s +[✔] client.filesystem."./".read 0.1s [✔] actions.deps 118.8s [✔] actions.test.script 0.1s [✔] actions.test 6.3s [✔] actions.build.run.script 0.0s [✔] actions.build.run 43.7s [✔] actions.build.contents 0.4s -[✔] client.filesystem.build.write 0.1s +[✔] client.filesystem."./_build".write 0.1s ``` Since this is a static application, we can open the files which are generated in `actions.build.contents` in a browser. -The last step - `client.filesystem.build.write` - copies the build result into the `build` directory on the host. +The last step - `client.filesystem.build.write` - copies the build result into the `_build` directory on the host. -On macOS, we run `open build/index.html` in our terminal and see the following app preview: +On macOS, we run `open _build/index.html` in our terminal and see the following app preview: ![todoapp preview](/img/getting-started/todoapp.macos.png) @@ -99,14 +99,14 @@ I change this line to `What must be done today?` and run the build locally again ```shell dagger do build -[✔] client.filesystem.".".read 0.0s +[✔] client.filesystem."./".read 0.0s [✔] actions.deps 7.5s [✔] actions.test.script 0.0s [✔] actions.test 6.0s [✔] actions.build.run.script 0.0s [✔] actions.build.run 29.2s [✔] actions.build.contents 0.0s -[✔] client.filesystem.build.write 0.1s +[✔] client.filesystem."./_build".write 0.1s ``` The total `42.8` time is macOS specific, since the Linux alternative is more than 8x quicker. @@ -160,20 +160,20 @@ dagger do build With an empty cache, installing all dependencies, then testing & generating a build for this example app completes in just under 1 minute: ```shell -[✔] client.filesystem.".".read 0.3s +[✔] client.filesystem."./".read 0.3s [✔] actions.deps 39.7s [✔] actions.test.script 0.2s [✔] actions.test 1.9s [✔] actions.build.run.script 0.1s [✔] actions.build.run 10.0s [✔] actions.build.contents 0.6s -[✔] client.filesystem.build.write 0.1s +[✔] client.filesystem."./_build".write 0.1s ``` Since this is a static application, we can open the files which are generated in `actions.build.contents` in a browser. -The last step - `client.filesystem.build.write` - copies the build result into the `build` directory on the host. +The last step - `client.filesystem.build.write` - copies the build result into the `_build` directory on the host. -On Linux, we run `xdg-open build/index.html` in our terminal and see the following app preview: +On Linux, we run `xdg-open _build/index.html` in our terminal and see the following app preview: ![todoapp preview](/img/getting-started/todoapp.linux.png) @@ -192,14 +192,14 @@ I change this line to `What must be done today?` and run the build locally again ```shell dagger do build -[✔] client.filesystem.".".read 0.0s +[✔] client.filesystem."./".read 0.0s [✔] actions.deps 1.1s [✔] actions.test.script 0.0s [✔] actions.test 0.0s [✔] actions.build.run.script 0.8s [✔] actions.build.run 2.9s [✔] actions.build.contents 0.0s -[✔] client.filesystem.build.write 0.0s +[✔] client.filesystem."./_build".write 0.0s ``` Being able to re-run the test & build loop locally in `4.8s`, at the same speed as running `yarn` scripts locally and without adding any extra dependencies to our host, is likely to change our approach to iterating on changes. @@ -249,16 +249,15 @@ With an empty cache, installing all dependencies, then testing & generating a bu [✔] actions.deps 62.1s [✔] actions.build.run.script 0.4s [✔] actions.test.script 0.5s -[✔] client.filesystem.".".read 0.6s +[✔] client.filesystem."./".read 0.6s [✔] actions.test 2.0s [✔] actions.build.run 12.4s [✔] actions.build.contents 0.1s -[✔] client.filesystem.build.write 0.2s -[✔] client.filesystem.".".read 0.2s +[✔] client.filesystem."./_build".write 0.2s ``` Since this is a static application, we can open the files which are generated in `actions.build.contents` in a browser. -The last step - `client.filesystem.build.write` - copies the build result into the `build` directory on the host. +The last step - `client.filesystem.build.write` - copies the build result into the `_build` directory on the host. On Windows, we run `start build/index.html` in our `Command Prompt` terminal and see the following app preview: @@ -278,16 +277,14 @@ I change this line to `What must be done today?` and run the build locally again ```shell dagger do build -INF upgrading buildkit have host network=true version=v0.10.0 [✔] actions.build.run.script 0.0s [✔] actions.deps 3.4s -[✔] client.filesystem.".".read 0.2s +[✔] client.filesystem."./".read 0.1s [✔] actions.test.script 0.0s [✔] actions.test 1.8s [✔] actions.build.run 7.7s [✔] actions.build.contents 0.2s -[✔] client.filesystem.build.write 0.2s -[✔] client.filesystem.".".read 0.1s +[✔] client.filesystem."./_build".write 0.2s ``` Being able to re-run the test & build loop locally in `13.6s`, without adding any extra dependencies to our host, is likely to change our approach to iterating on changes.